IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v20y2024i1p57-67n1013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Heng

    (Biostatistics, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA 94404, USA)

  • Heitjan Daniel F.

    (Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA)

Abstract

In clinical trials that are subject to noncompliance, the commonly used intention-to-treat estimand is valid as a causal effect of treatment assignment but is sensitive to the level of compliance. An alternative estimand, the complier average causal effect (CACE), measures the average effect of treatment received in the latent subset of subjects who would comply with either assigned treatment. Because the principal stratum of compliers can vary with the circumstances of the trial, CACE too depends on the compliance fraction. We propose a model in which an underlying latent proto-compliance interacts with trial characteristics to determine a subject’s compliance behavior. When the latent compliance is independent of the individual treatment effect, the average causal effect is constant across compliance classes, and CACE is robust across trials and equal to the population average causal effect. We demonstrate the potential degree of sensitivity of CACE in a simulation study, an analysis of data from a trial of vitamin A supplementation in children, and a meta-analysis of trials of epidural analgesia in labor.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Heng & Heitjan Daniel F., 2024. "Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 57-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:57-67:n:1013
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2022-0105
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2022-0105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:57-67:n:1013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.