IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v20y2024i1p157-167n1009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HiPerMAb: a tool for judging the potential of small sample size biomarker pilot studies

Author

Listed:
  • Al-Mekhlafi Amani

    (Department of Biostatistics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Klawonn Frank

    (Department of Computer Science, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbuettel, Germany)

Abstract

Common statistical approaches are not designed to deal with so-called “short fat data” in biomarker pilot studies, where the number of biomarker candidates exceeds the sample size by magnitudes. High-throughput technologies for omics data enable the measurement of ten thousands and more biomarker candidates for specific diseases or states of a disease. Due to the limited availability of study participants, ethical reasons and high costs for sample processing and analysis researchers often prefer to start with a small sample size pilot study in order to judge the potential of finding biomarkers that enable – usually in combination – a sufficiently reliable classification of the disease state under consideration. We developed a user-friendly tool, called HiPerMAb that allows to evaluate pilot studies based on performance measures like multiclass AUC, entropy, area above the cost curve, hypervolume under manifold, and misclassification rate using Monte-Carlo simulations to compute the p-values and confidence intervals. The number of “good” biomarker candidates is compared to the expected number of “good” biomarker candidates in a data set with no association to the considered disease states. This allows judging the potential in the pilot study even if statistical tests with correction for multiple testing fail to provide any hint of significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Al-Mekhlafi Amani & Klawonn Frank, 2024. "HiPerMAb: a tool for judging the potential of small sample size biomarker pilot studies," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 157-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:157-167:n:1009
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2022-0063
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2022-0063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:20:y:2024:i:1:p:157-167:n:1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.