IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/germec/v16y2015i3p324-342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rating Agencies – An Experimental Analysis of Their Remuneration Model

Author

Listed:
  • Bühren Christoph

    (University of Kassel,Kassel, Germany)

  • Pleßner Marco

    (University of Kassel,Kassel, Germany)

Abstract

Does it matter who pays for ratings? Yes, but not for the rating agencies’ behavior. These are the findings of our experiment where we analyze the effect of the remuneration model of rating agencies on their assessments as well as on investors’ and issuers’ behavior. First, we find that rating agencies’ assessments are comparable whether the agency is (partially) paid by issuers, investors or solely by the experimenter. Issuers, on the other hand, more often do not return investor’s trust when they or investors pay for ratings. Further, investors more often act according to the agencies’ recommendations when they have to pay for this information.

Suggested Citation

  • Bühren Christoph & Pleßner Marco, 2015. "Rating Agencies – An Experimental Analysis of Their Remuneration Model," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 16(3), pages 324-342, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:germec:v:16:y:2015:i:3:p:324-342
    DOI: 10.1111/geer.12074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12074
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/geer.12074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:germec:v:16:y:2015:i:3:p:324-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.