Author
Listed:
- Jung Jeah
(Pennsylvania State University College of Health and Human Development – Health Policy and Administration, 604 Ford Building, University Park, PA 16802-6500, USA)
- Feldman Roger D.
(University of Minnesota – Twin Cities – Health Policy and Management, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
- McBean Marshall
(University of Minnesota – Twin Cities – Health Policy and Management, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
Abstract
Specialty drugs can bring substantial benefits to patients with debilitating conditions, such as cancer, but their costs are very high. Insurers/payers have increased patient cost-sharing for specialty drugs to manage specialty drug spending. We utilized Medicare Part D plan formulary data to create the initial price (cost-sharing in the initial coverage phase in Part D), and estimated the total demand (both on- and off-label uses) for specialty cancer drugs among elderly Medicare Part D enrollees with no low-income subsidies (non-LIS) as a function of the initial price. We corrected for potential endogeneity associated with plan choice by instrumenting the initial price of specialty cancer drugs with the initial prices of specialty drugs in unrelated classes. We report three findings. First, we found that elderly non-LIS beneficiaries with cancer were less likely to use a Part D specialty cancer drug when the initial price was high: the overall price elasticity of specialty cancer drug spending ranged between −0.72 and −0.75. Second, the price effect in Part D specialty cancer drug use was not significant among newly diagnosed patients. Finally, we found that use of Part B-covered cancer drugs was not responsive to the Part D specialty cancer drug price. As the demand for costly specialty drugs grows, it will be important to identify clinical circumstances where specialty drugs can be valuable and ensure access to high-value treatments.
Suggested Citation
Jung Jeah & Feldman Roger D. & McBean Marshall, 2017.
"The Price Elasticity of Specialty Drug Use: Evidence from Cancer Patients in Medicare Part D,"
Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:20:y:2017:i:2:p:19:n:1
DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2016-0007
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:20:y:2017:i:2:p:19:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.