IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/fhecpo/v14y2011i3n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The State and Future of Blood-Based Biomarkers in the Health and Retirement Study

Author

Listed:
  • McDade Thomas

    (Northwestern University, t-mcdade@northwestern.edu)

Abstract

The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) is an important national resource for policy makers and investigators across a wide range of disciplines, and it is critical that the study collects the best information possible on the health status of its participants within the constraints of the survey design, and without compromising the integrity of the sample. Potential directions for the collection and analysis of biomarker data in future waves of HRS are discussed, with a primary focus on blood-based biomarkers. Advantages and disadvantages of various methods for collecting blood in the home are considered, with particular attention given to the strengths and weaknesses of dried blood spot (DBS) sampling. DBS sampling has been widely applied in recent biosocial surveys due to the low cost and burden associated with sample collection, but these benefits need to be weighed against challenges associated with quantification in the laboratory. Attention is also given to additional biomarkers that may be of relevance to HRS, and that would expand the survey’s current focus on obesity and metabolic syndrome. Measures of inflammation, pathogen exposure, reproductive function, stress, and epigenetic modifications are suggested as potentially productive future directions for the study. In addition, the analysis concludes with the following recommendations for HRS: Continue to collect DBS samples, but consider alternatives; implement enhanced procedures for quality control; calibrate DBS results against plasma values, and invest in methods development.

Suggested Citation

  • McDade Thomas, 2011. "The State and Future of Blood-Based Biomarkers in the Health and Retirement Study," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:14:y:2011:i:3:n:5
    DOI: 10.2202/1558-9544.1263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-9544.1263
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1558-9544.1263?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas W. McDade & Stacy Tessler Lindau & Kristen Wroblewski, 2010. "Predictors of C-Reactive Protein in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(1), pages 129-136.
    2. Sharon R. Williams & Thomas W. McDade, 2009. "The Use of Dried Blood Spot Sampling in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(suppl_1), pages 131-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Banks & James P. Smith, 2012. "International Comparisons in Health Economics: Evidence from Aging Studies," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 57-81, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aniruddha Das & Stephanie Nairn, 2016. "Editor's choice Religious Attendance and Physiological Problems in Late Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 71(2), pages 291-308.
    2. Ferraro, Kenneth F. & Kim, Seoyoun, 2014. "Health benefits of religion among Black and White older adults? Race, religiosity, and C-reactive protein," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 92-99.
    3. Linda Waite & Aniruddha Das, 2010. "Families, social life, and well-being at older ages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(1), pages 87-109, March.
    4. Karb, Rebecca A. & Elliott, Michael R. & Dowd, Jennifer B. & Morenoff, Jeffrey D., 2012. "Neighborhood-level stressors, social support, and diurnal patterns of cortisol: The Chicago Community Adult Health Study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(6), pages 1038-1047.
    5. McDade, Thomas W. & Meyer, Jess M. & Koning, Stephanie M. & Harris, Kathleen Mullan, 2021. "Body mass and the epidemic of chronic inflammation in early mid-adulthood," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    6. Mona Elbarbary & Trenton Honda & Geoffrey Morgan & Yuming Guo & Yanfei Guo & Paul Kowal & Joel Negin, 2020. "Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Association with Anaemia Prevalence and Haemoglobin Levels in Chinese Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. McDade, Thomas W. & Koning, Stephanie M., 2021. "Early origins of socioeconomic inequalities in chronic inflammation: Evaluating the contributions of low birth weight and short breastfeeding," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    8. Schafer, Markus H. & Ferraro, Kenneth F., 2011. "Distal and variably proximal causes: Education, obesity, and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1340-1348.
    9. Das, Aniruddha, 2013. "How does race get “under the skin”?: Inflammation, weathering, and metabolic problems in late life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 75-83.
    10. Das, Aniruddha, 2016. "Psychosocial distress and inflammation: Which way does causality flow?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1-8.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Health and Retirement Study;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:fhecpo:v:14:y:2011:i:3:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.