IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/evoice/v7y2010i3n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Taxes to Move Toward Fiscal Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Nordhaus William D

Abstract

A carbon tax would improve fiscal sustainability in the United States according to William Nordhaus of Yale University. There is no better fiscal instrument to employ at this time, in this country, and given the fiscal constraints the government faces.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordhaus William D, 2010. "Carbon Taxes to Move Toward Fiscal Sustainability," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 1-5, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:7:y:2010:i:3:n:3
    DOI: 10.2202/1553-3832.1772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-3832.1772
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1553-3832.1772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian A. Lange & Sarah Polborn, 2012. "Can Lobbying Encourage Abatement? Designing a New Policy Instrument," CESifo Working Paper Series 3760, CESifo.
    2. Pereira, Alfredo & Pereira, Rui, 2016. "On the Optimal Use of Revenues from a CO2 Tax and the Importance of Labor Market Conditions," MPRA Paper 77630, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Rong Zhou & Kathleen Segerson, 2012. "Are Green Taxes a Good Way to Help Solve State Budget Deficits?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Sasmoko Sasmoko & Leonardus W. Wasono Mihardjo & Firdaus Alamsjah & Elidjen Elidjen & Arun Kumar Tarofder, 2019. "Investigating the Effect of Digital Technologies, Energy Consumption and Climate Change on Customer s Experience: A Study from Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 353-362.
    5. Matthew J. Kotchen & Kevin J. Boyle & Anthony A. Leiserowitz, 2011. "Policy-Instrument Choice and Benefit Estimates for Climate-Change Policy in the United States," NBER Working Papers 17539, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Alfredo Marvao Pereira & Rui Marvao Pereira, 2019. "Achieving the triple dividend in Portugal: a dynamic general-equilibrium evaluation of a carbon tax indexed to emissions trading," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 148-163, April.
    7. Sugey de Jesús López Pérez & Xavier Vence, 2021. "When Harmful Tax Expenditure Prevails over Environmental Tax: An Assessment on the 2014 Mexican Fiscal Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Pereira, Alfredo M. & Pereira, Rui M. & Rodrigues, Pedro G., 2016. "A new carbon tax in Portugal: A missed opportunity to achieve the triple dividend?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 110-118.
    9. Nielsen, Chris P. & Ho, Mun S. & Zhao, Yu & Wang, Yuxuan & Lei, Yu & Cao, Jing, 2013. "An Integrated Assessment of the Economic Costs and Environmental Benefits of Carbon Taxes in China," Conference papers 332406, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Alfredo M. Pereira & Rui M. Pereira, 2014. "Environmental Fiscal Reform and Fiscal Consolidation," Public Finance Review, , vol. 42(2), pages 222-253, March.
    11. Rui M. Pereira & Alfredo M. Pereira, 2017. "The Economic and Budgetary Impact of Climate Policy in Portugal: Carbon Taxation in a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model with Endogenous Public Sector Behavior," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(2), pages 231-259, June.
    12. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Boyle, Kevin J. & Leiserowitz, Anthony A., 2013. "Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 617-625.
    13. Kejia Yan & Rakesh Gupta & Suneel Maheshwari, 2023. "Using Carbon Tax to Reach the U.S.’s 2050 NDCs Goals—A CGE Model of Firms, Government, and Households," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Xavier Vence & Sugey de Jesus López Pérez, 2021. "Taxation for a Circular Economy: New Instruments, Reforms, and Architectural Changes in the Fiscal System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:7:y:2010:i:3:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.