IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v5y2008i3p305-352n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Private Investments in Public Equity (PIPEs) – A Closer Look at PIPE Transactions in Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Gerhard Frank

    (*Dr.iur., Attorney-at-Law, LL.M (Columbia), partner, Homburger AG, Zurich.)

Abstract

PIPEs allow to raise equity in a quick, confidential, secure, flexible and cost-effective way. Companies that typically have recourse to PIPE financing are not in a position to proceed to a rights offering which would be likely to fail because of the difficult market environment, or they are not able to get new funds by way of a bank loan due to their revenue and profit situation. Such companies are especially active in capital-intensive and growth-oriented industry sectors such as the biotechnology, pharmaceutical, technology and telecommunications industry. However, in Switzerland PIPEs have not been discovered (yet) as a genuine fund raising alternative, mainly because they are considered to be difficult to structure, e.g. due to the statutory pre-emptive right of the existing shareholders. Evidence suggests that in Switzerland, too, PIPEs are not only suitable for recapitalization, but also for growth financing purposes. This article tries to set out, inter alia, the possibilities of withdrawing the pre-emptive right or the cases in which such a disapplication would be desirable in order to widen the scope of PIPEs in Switzerland – especially with mid- and small-cap companies –, as well as the legal consequences of such PIPE transactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard Frank, 2008. "Private Investments in Public Equity (PIPEs) – A Closer Look at PIPE Transactions in Switzerland," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 305-352, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:305-352:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ECFR.2008.305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2008.305
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ECFR.2008.305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:305-352:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.