Author
Listed:
- Moszyńska Anna
(Prof. Dr., Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Law and Administration, Department of Commercial Law, Maritime Law and Civil Procedure, Toruń, Poland.)
- Sikorska-Lewandowska Aleksandra
(Dr., Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Law and Administration, Department of Commercial Law, Maritime Law and Civil Procedure, Toruń, Poland.)
- Kłoda Mariusz T.
(Dr. Candidate, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Faculty of Law and Administration, Department of Commercial Law, Maritime Law and Civil Procedure, Toruń, Poland.)
Abstract
866The Polish regulation concerning a limited joint-stock partnership has been in force since the date of entry into force of the Commercial Companies Code (CCC). The CCC divides commercial companies into “partnerships” and “capital companies”. Each of those two types of commercial companies is governed by separate rules. The completion of twenty years of Polish CCC in force prompts us to analyse the juridical model adopted by the legislature, according to which limited joint-stock partnership is classified as a partnership. During this period, there have been significant events making the verification of the validity of this model possible, including Poland’s accession to the European Union (EU), which has resulted in the need to adapt national regulations to EU law – both in the field of private law (including commercial law) and public law (including tax law). The need to amend the domestic law in connection with the implementation of Directive (EU) 2019/2121 of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 27, 2019 amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (as regards cross-border conversions, mergers, and divisions of companies) – is a direct motivation for undertaking research on a Polish limited joint-stock partnership.867
Suggested Citation
Moszyńska Anna & Sikorska-Lewandowska Aleksandra & Kłoda Mariusz T., 2023.
"The Polish Model of a Limited Joint-Stock Partnership in Comparison with Other European Legal Systems,"
European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(5-6), pages 866-886, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:20:y:2023:i:5-6:p:866-886:n:4
DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2023-0036
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:20:y:2023:i:5-6:p:866-886:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.