IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v15y2018i1p123-147n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Protection against Decisions of the Single Resolution Board pursuant to Article 85 Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Skauradszun Dominik

    (Professor of civil law and economic law, in particular corporate law, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Germany and Of Counsel at Gleiss Lutz, Germany. I am grateful for inviting me to present the paper at the Federal Ministry of Finance on 9 February 2017. Furthermore, I am grateful for helpful research and comments by Maximilian Heil, Claus Schindler and Markus Klein – all research assistants at the for mentioned professorship. All errors are mine.Fulda University of Applied SciencesFuldaGermany)

Abstract

The Single Resolution Board is a powerful authority in the European Union – perhaps even one of the most powerful. The system for legal protection against decisions of the Single Resolution Board based on Article 85 of the Regulation (EU) No 06/2014 is complex. The competent Appeal Panel has rejected more than 80 percent of all cases up to now and decided that the large majority of all appeals were not even admissible. Nevertheless, the legal literature on legal protection against decisions of the Single Resolution Board is minimal. As far as can be seen, no in-depth examination of the appeal procedure has been published yet. Case law of the General Court is not (yet) available. This study examines Article 85 of the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation and presents an interpretation of the legal protection system that balances the interests of credit institutions as well as the interests of the European financial market and the European taxpayers in a powerful European resolution authority. The results are summarised in 10 theses at the end of this paper for further discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Skauradszun Dominik, 2018. "Legal Protection against Decisions of the Single Resolution Board pursuant to Article 85 Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 123-147, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:123-147:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2018-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0005
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ecfr-2018-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelo Baglioni, 2016. "The European Banking Union," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-56314-9, February.
    2. Giuseppe Boccuzzi, 2016. "The European Banking Union," Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-55565-6, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimiliano Celli, 2023. "The Non-Required by Law Measures by Deposit Guarantee Schemes to Protect Bank Accounts: The Case of Italian FITD," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 17(8), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Angelo Baglioni & Marcello Esposito, 2016. "Modigliani-Miller Doesn’t Hold in a “Bailinable” World: A New Capital Structure to Reduce the Banks’ Funding Cost," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def052, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    3. Domenica Tropeano, 2020. "Does the BRRD affect the retail banking business model in the Euro area?," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 49(2), July.
    4. Agnieszka Sokolowska, 2020. "The deposit insurance system in the European Union [System gwarantowania depozytow w Unii Europejskiej]," Catallaxy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 5(2), pages 97-105, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:123-147:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.