Author
Listed:
- Macchiavello Eugenia
(Lecturer/Adjunct Professor in Banking Law, University of Genoa, Department of Economics and Business; Senior Research Fellow, Genoa Centre for Law and Finance. I submitted the present paper at the end of January 2017 but it was published only now: I have updated it with the latest official documents issued during Summer 2017 but it was not possible, unfortunately, to take into account also the literature published meanwhile. I want to thank the anonymous referees of the ECFR as well as the Professors listening to my presentation on this topic at the University of Luxembourg on June 30th, 2016 for their very useful suggestions and comments.University of GenoaGenoaItaly)
Abstract
The relationship between financial innovators and regulators has been historically tense, with financial innovators taking advantage of loopholes and regulators desperately trying to keep pace with innovations while dealing with limited resources and long bureaucratic processes. Nonetheless, in recent years, FinTechs – un-regulated start-ups applying technology to finance – have exponentially accelerated such race, making innovative regulatory approaches and new perspectives necessary. The present paper discusses relevant issues pertaining to the regulation of FinTech, using financial-return crowdfunding (FR-crowdfunding) as case study and model, deriving from its FinTech, shadow banking and collaborative economy natures, important indications for regulators. Current trends in regulating FR-crowdfunding in Member States are also analysed, together with related shortcomings and benefits, with the view to proposing a more harmonised regime for the sector, tailored to its risks and features and advancing Capital Markets Union objectives.
Suggested Citation
Macchiavello Eugenia, 2017.
"Financial-return Crowdfunding and Regulatory Approaches in the Shadow Banking, FinTech and Collaborative Finance Era,"
European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 662-722, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:662-722:n:4
DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2017-0030
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:662-722:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.