Author
Listed:
- Binder Jens-Hinrich
(Professor of Law, Chair of Private Law and Commercial Law, Eberhard-Karls-Universitaet, Tuebingen, Germany; E-mail: binder@jura.uni-tuebingen.de. The paper has been prepared for the Symposium “Multinational Banking: Capturing the Benefits and Avoiding the Pitfalls”, held at Queen Mary and Westfield University of London, on 9 and 10 September 2015. The author gratefully acknowledges the invitation to contribute this event, and would like to thank, in particular, Christos Hadjiemmanuil for insightful comments. The findings developed herein have since been presented at seminars at the London School of Economics and Political Science, the University of Verona, a staff training seminar at the European Court of Auditors, as well as the Third Annual Banking Union Conference 2016 organised jointly by the Institute for Law and Finance at Goethe University, Frankfurt, and law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. The paper much benefited from further valuable input gained throughout, as well as from valuable comments by two unnamed referees. The usual disclaimer applies.Germany)
Abstract
Among the many technical challenges that continue to have an impact on the effective resolution of large, complex, internationally active banking institutions and groups, the cross-border coordination of measures taken in different jurisdictions clearly is one of the most difficult to address. Given complex – and usually conflicting – vested national interests in home and host jurisdictions, cooperation requires not just a robust decision-making infrastructure, but also depends on the predictability of the economic outcomes of resolution – and on the fairness and reliability of ex ante commitments to joint burden-sharing. Given the dimension of these preconditions, it is hardly surprising that some jurisdictions, including, notably, the USA, have opted for ‘isolationist’, unilateral resolution actions vis-à-vis foreign-owned banks instead. The present article critically evaluates the new framework for cross-border bank resolution under the European Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and the Single Resolution Mechanism as a counter-example, and identifies residual shortcomings in this regard.
Suggested Citation
Binder Jens-Hinrich, 2016.
"Cross‐border coordination of bank resolution in the EU: All problems resolved?,"
European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 575-598, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:575-598:n:2
DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2016-5006
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:575-598:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.