IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/erjour/v6y2016i2p175-206n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accountability of Venture Support Agencies: Do They Really Help?

Author

Listed:
  • Jagoda Kalinga

    (Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Lin Xiaohua

    (Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University, 575 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C5, Canada)

  • Calvert Victoria

    (Bissett School of Business, Mount Royal University, 4825 Mount Royal Gate, SW, Calgary, Alberta T3E 6K6, Canada)

  • Tao Shaw

    (SM Research, Markham, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

There is widespread recognition of the vital role small and medium enterprises (SME) play in the sustainability of the Canadian rural landscape. However, rural entrepreneurs face barriers and challenges throughout the start-up and growth stages of their ventures. The rapid development of e-commerce, coupled with increasing big-box competition and shifting demographics challenge the sustainability of rural SMEs. The literature recognizes gaps in SME owner capability, pertaining to business planning, the use of financial information, the implementation of Information Technologies, and funding. It should be noted that the effectiveness of Government policies regarding support for training in these areas through publically funded agencies is well documented. However, research regarding the effectiveness of these agencies in reaching and meeting the needs of rural venture owners is primarily restricted to funding requirements. This paper examines the utilization and satisfaction of venture support agencies and community organizations by rural SME owners in 14 communities through a Business Expansion and Retention (BR&E) research project conducted in Alberta, Canada. The results indicated that agency usage can be effectively predicted by firm size, degree of localization, and planning. Results indicate that while many owners identified the need for assistance in training and funding, the utilization of support agencies, underscored by the lack of user satisfaction, may hinder rather than enhance venture viability and growth. The implications for government policy are discussed in the context of enhancing the effectiveness of support agencies, thereby contributing to the viability of ventures and the sustainability of rural communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagoda Kalinga & Lin Xiaohua & Calvert Victoria & Tao Shaw, 2016. "Accountability of Venture Support Agencies: Do They Really Help?," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 175-206, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:175-206:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/erj-2014-0038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2014-0038
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/erj-2014-0038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shanklin, William L. & Ryans, John Jr., 1998. "Stoking the small business engine," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 27-33.
    2. Mark Drabenstott & Jason Henderson, 2006. "A new rural economy: a new role for public policy," Main Street Economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue 4.
    3. Akgun, A.A. & Baycan, T. & Nijkamp, P., 2011. "Repositioning rural areas as promising future hot spots," Serie Research Memoranda 0013, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    4. Terry L. Besser & Nicholas Recker & Matthew Parker, 2009. "The Impact of New Employers From the Outside, the Growth of Local Capitalism, and New Amenities on the Social and Economic Welfare of Small Towns," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(4), pages 306-316, November.
    5. T A Lyson & C M Tolbert, 1996. "Small Manufacturing and Nonmetropolitan Socioeconomic Well-Being," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(10), pages 1779-1794, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Darger & Alan Barefield & Brent D. Hales, 2017. "Business retention and expansion (BRE) today – research, application, and evaluation: Introduction to the special issue," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 160-169, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfred Nucci & Charles Tolbert & Troy Blanchard & Michael Irwin, 2002. "Leaving Home: Modeling the Effect of Civic and Economic Structure on Individual Migration Patterns," Working Papers 02-16, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    2. Alena Harbiankova & Elena Scherbina, 2021. "Evaluation Model for Sustainable Development of Settlement System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Kusio, Tomasz & Kudełko, Joanna & Borges, Alexandra & Delic, Anamarija & Stroila, Iulia, 2022. "Are there any differences in rural development challenges within European countries? Social and economic contexts from EU rural leaders," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(5), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:erjour:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:175-206:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.