Author
Abstract
This paper is a continuation of the article “A Critical Note on the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)” published in Economic Quality Control 23. Unfortunately, the critique expressed on the GUM in that paper has so far been ignored by the metrology community. This paper shall illustrate and discuss the flawed use of statistical terms and methods in metrology. The GUM was published more than a decade ago, and undergoes presently a revision. Therefore, it is to be hoped that the here discussed weak points might be avoided in a new version of the GUM.The IMEKO is a very important organization. On the IMEKO homepage one can read the following words: International Measurement confederation, IMEKO is a non-governmental federation of 39 Member Organizations individually concerned with the advancement of measurement technology. Its fundamental objectives are the promotion of international interchange of scientific and technical information in the field of measurement and instrumentation and the enhancement of international co-operation among scientists and engineers from research and industry. Founded in 1958, the Confederation has consultative status with UNESCO and UNIDO and is one of the five Sister Federations within FIACC: Five International Associations Co-ordinating Committee, further consisting ofIFAC- International Federation of Automatic Control,IFIP - International Federation for Information Processing,IFORS - International Federation of Operational Research Societies andIMACS - International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation.In September 2009, the IMEKO World Congress was organized in Lisbon, and the latest “scientific results” were exchanged by the leading metrologists. In this paper some of these results shall be examined and evaluated.
Suggested Citation
von Collani Elart, 2009.
"A Note on the XIX IMEKO World Congress Fundamental and Applied Metrology,"
Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 24(2), pages 287-307, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:287-307:n:11
DOI: 10.1515/EQC.2009.287
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:24:y:2009:i:2:p:287-307:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.