Author
Listed:
- Das Nandini
(SQC T& P Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Calcutta -700108, nandini@isical.ac.in)
Abstract
Resistivity of resin plays a vital role for trouble free performance of electrostatic application of resin based paints. Low resistivity results in electrical shorting and high resistivity leads to poor deposition of paints due to insufficient charge pick up. Hence resin resistivity should be maintained within a specified range. The present study was undertaken in a reputed paints manufacturing enterprise. The concerned firm was not able to maintain the resistivity value within the desired specification. They were consistently getting low resistivity. It was decided to study on identifying significant factors for controlling resistivity through experimentation.A 23 full factorial experiment was conducted with three factors phthalic anhydride%, water collection time, and solvent distillate collection time, each varying at two levels. The experiment could not be replicated due to time constraint. After analysing the data, using Bayesian method of posterior probability plot the main effect of water collection time and solvent distillate collection time were found to be significant at 5% level of significance. Considering expected values of resistivity at different levels of significant factors, optimum levels were arrived at so as to achieve the expected average resistivity value closed to the target value. Taking experimental error into account a 95% confidence interval was obtained which was lying within the desired specification. Confirmatory trials were made for few batches. Since the results of confirmatory trials were satisfactory the recommendations were accepted by plant management. As a result of implementation of the recommendations of the present study the concerned firm was able to get the value of resin resistivity within the specification.
Suggested Citation
Das Nandini, 2004.
"Improving Resistivity of Resin,"
Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 127-132, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:19:y:2004:i:1:p:127-132:n:4
DOI: 10.1515/EQC.2004.127
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:19:y:2004:i:1:p:127-132:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.