IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ecqcon/v17y2002i2p195-220n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling of Explosives Sensitivity Part 2: The Weibull-Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wild Roland

    (Wehrwissenschaftliches Institut für Werk-, Explosiv- und Betriebsstoffe, Großes Cent, D-53913 Swisttal-Heimerzheim, Germany)

  • von Collani Elart

    (Stochastikon GmbH, Schießhausstr. 15, D-97072 Würzburg, Germany)

Abstract

In the first part of this paper [Wild and von Collani, Economic Quality Control 17: 113-122, 2002] the Bruceton method and the underlying model assumptions for assessing the sensitivity of explosives were critically examined resulting in the recommendation not to use the Bruceton method. The second part describes an alternative model and method for analyzing the sensitivity of explosive materials. The resulting procedure is applied for comparing the explosive sensitivity of two different kinds of hexogen and for analyzing the sensitivity of a number of other popular explosives.

Suggested Citation

  • Wild Roland & von Collani Elart, 2002. "Modelling of Explosives Sensitivity Part 2: The Weibull-Model," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 195-220, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:17:y:2002:i:2:p:195-220:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/EQC.2002.195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/EQC.2002.195
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/EQC.2002.195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ecqcon:v:17:y:2002:i:2:p:195-220:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.