IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/econoa/v19y2025i1p22n1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Fintech Improve the Risk-Taking Capacity of Commercial Banks? Empirical Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wu Binghui

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710119, China)

  • Qi Yaxin

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, 710119, China)

Abstract

As information technology and financial innovation advance, fintech has become increasingly important for commercial banks. Whether fintech can enhance banks’ risk-taking capacity has become an important factor affecting financial stability. Based on China’s Baidu search index, we use web crawler, text mining, and the global principal component analysis to construct a fintech index, and analyze the relationship between fintech and the risk-taking capacity. Then, we further investigate the mechanism by which fintech affects the risk-taking capacity from three dimensions of banking business structure: credit structure, debt structure, and income structure. The findings are summarized below. First, fintech in general can significantly improve the risk-taking capacity of commercial banks. Second, the heterogeneity test shows that fintech plays a more significant role in promoting the risk-taking capacity of small-scale banks, listed banks, and banks located in economically underdeveloped areas. Third, the mechanism test shows that fintech enhances the risk-taking capacity by changing the business structure of banks, especially by improving the credit capacity, expanding the deposit size, and diversifying the income structure. The above findings have important policy implications for banks and regulators in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu Binghui & Qi Yaxin, 2025. "Does Fintech Improve the Risk-Taking Capacity of Commercial Banks? Empirical Evidence from China," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:econoa:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:22:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/econ-2025-0143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2025-0143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/econ-2025-0143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:econoa:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:22:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.