IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/cferev/v12y2023i4p108-129n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Input Trade Liberalization and Welfare Loss of Manufacturing Enterprises: Based on the Perspective of Efficient Market Power

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Yifan

    (Business School, Nankai University, Huangshan, China)

  • Yang Jijun

    (School of Finance and Taxation, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, China)

  • Yu Jinping

    (Business School, Nankai University, Huangshan, China)

Abstract

Considering that upstream monopoly will lead to an exponential increase in the loss of social welfare, this paper investigates the impact of intermediate goods tariff concession on the welfare loss of manufacturing enterprises from the perspective of input trade liberalization and effective market power. It has been discovered that input trade liberalization significantly reduces the welfare loss of manufacturing enterprises. Due to the game condition in which oligopolies check each other and small businesses “gain from fishing”, the inhibitory impact increases as market share decreases. The mechanism test demonstrates that input trade liberalization boosts the effect of technical competition and minimizes welfare loss through promoting market development degree and reducing factor distortion. In addition, this paper also finds that the effect of input trade liberalization on high monopolistic power enterprises is obviously stronger than that of low monopolistic power enterprises. Furthermore, the impact on non-high-tech industries and capital-intensive enterprises is significant, while that on high-tech industries and labor-intensive industries is not. Therefore, the welfare loss should be investigated from the dual perspective of market structure and marker power. Competitiveness has an important effect, while trade liberalization of intermediate inputs has a pivotal effect on promoting market development and improving resource allocation efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Yifan & Yang Jijun & Yu Jinping, 2023. "Input Trade Liberalization and Welfare Loss of Manufacturing Enterprises: Based on the Perspective of Efficient Market Power," China Finance and Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 108-129, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:cferev:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:108-129:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/cfer-2023-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2023-0024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cfer-2023-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:cferev:v:12:y:2023:i:4:p:108-129:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.