IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/cferev/v10y2021i4p96-114n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Internet Use Improve the Income of Residents? —Empirical Evidence from CGSS2017

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Xiaoxiao

    (Doctoral Candidate at School of Statistics of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu China)

  • Zhang Jie

    (Doctoral Candidate at School of Statistics of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu China)

  • Peng Gang

    (Associate Professor at School of Statistics of Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu China.)

Abstract

The Internet penetration rate rises sharply in recent years in China. This change has had a significant impact on residents’ income. By using Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) data set, this paper investigates whether residents who use the Internet earn a higher income than similar residents who do not use the Internet by using propensity score matching. The results show that there is a premium associated with Internet use. Estimates suggest that a premium for residents who use the Internet is around twice as much for residents who do not use the Internet. Additionally, this paper finds that the inlome differences between using the Internet and not using the Internet for groups of middle-aged and elderly resident and agricultural household registration residents are more significant. Based on the research results, several relevant policy implications are presented to improve resident’s income.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Xiaoxiao & Zhang Jie & Peng Gang, 2021. "Does Internet Use Improve the Income of Residents? —Empirical Evidence from CGSS2017," China Finance and Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 96-114, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:cferev:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:96-114:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/cfer-2021-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2021-0024
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cfer-2021-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:cferev:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:96-114:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.