IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v7y2019i1p29n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Randomization Tests that Condition on Non-Categorical Covariate Balance

Author

Listed:
  • Branson Zach

    (Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)

  • Miratrix Luke W.

    (Graduate School of Education and Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)

Abstract

A benefit of randomized experiments is that covariate distributions of treatment and control groups are balanced on average, resulting in simple unbiased estimators for treatment effects. However, it is possible that a particular randomization yields covariate imbalances that researchers want to address in the analysis stage through adjustment or other methods. Here we present a randomization test that conditions on covariate balance by only considering treatment assignments that are similar to the observed one in terms of covariate balance. Previous conditional randomization tests have only allowed for categorical covariates, while our randomization test allows for any type of covariate. Through extensive simulation studies, we find that our conditional randomization test is more powerful than unconditional randomization tests and other conditional tests. Furthermore, we find that our conditional randomization test is valid (1) unconditionally across levels of covariate balance, and (2) conditional on particular levels of covariate balance. Meanwhile, unconditional randomization tests are valid for (1) but not (2). Finally, we find that our conditional randomization test is similar to a randomization test that uses a model-adjusted test statistic.

Suggested Citation

  • Branson Zach & Miratrix Luke W., 2019. "Randomization Tests that Condition on Non-Categorical Covariate Balance," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:29:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2018-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2018-0004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2018-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:29:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.