IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v13y2025i1p12n1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of placebo samples in observational studies

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Ting

    (Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Washington, United States)

  • He Qijia

    (Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Washington, United States)

  • Chen Shuxiao

    (Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States)

  • Zhang Bo

    (Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, United States)

Abstract

In an observational study, it is common to leverage known null effects to detect bias. One such strategy is to set aside a placebo sample – a subset of data immune from the hypothesized cause-and-effect relationship. Existence of an effect in the placebo sample raises concerns about unmeasured confounding bias while the absence of it helps corroborate the causal conclusion. This article describes a framework for using a placebo sample to detect and remove bias. We state the identification assumptions and develop estimation and inference methods based on outcome regression, inverse probability weighting, and doubly robust approaches. Simulation studies investigate the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods. We illustrate the methods using an empirical study of the effect of the earned income tax credit on infant health.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Ting & He Qijia & Chen Shuxiao & Zhang Bo, 2025. "Role of placebo samples in observational studies," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:12:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2023-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2023-0020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2023-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:12:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.