IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v12y2024i1p21n1001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current philosophical perspectives on drug approval in the real world

Author

Listed:
  • Landes Jürgen

    (Department of Philosophy “Piero Martinetti”, University of Milan, Milan, Italy)

  • Auker-Howlett Daniel J.

    (Independent Researcher, Cambridge, UK)

Abstract

The evidence-based medicine approach to causal medical inference is the dominant account among medical methodologists. Competing approaches originating in the philosophy of medicine seek to challenge this account. In order to see how successful these challenges are, we need to assess the performance of all approaches in real world medical inference. One important real world problem all approaches could be applied to is the assessment of drugs for approval by drug regulation agencies. This study assesses the success of the status quo against an empirical non-systematically obtained body of evidence and we scrutinise the alternative approaches from the armchair, contemplating how they would fare in the real world. We tentatively conclude that the status quo is regularly not successful at its primary task as it regularly fails to correctly assess effectiveness and safety and suggest that this is due to inherent factors of the “messy real world.” However, while all alternatives hold promise, they are at least as susceptible to the real world issues that beset the status quo. We also make recommendations for changes to current drug approval procedures, identify lacunae to fill in the alternatives, and finally, call for a continuation of the development of alternative approaches to causal medical inference and recommendations for changes to current drug approval procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Landes Jürgen & Auker-Howlett Daniel J., 2024. "Current philosophical perspectives on drug approval in the real world," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:21:n:1001
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2023-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2023-0011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2023-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:21:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.