IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v11y2023i1p13n1013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of in-sample positivity violations using regression trees: The PoRT algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Danelian Gabriel

    (Université de Lille, Lille, France)

  • Foucher Yohann

    (UMR INSERM 1246 – SPHERE, Université de Nantes, Université de Tours, Nantes, France)

  • Léger Maxime

    (UMR INSERM 1246 – SPHERE, Université de Nantes, Université de Tours, Nantes, France)

  • Le Borgne Florent

    (IDBC/A2COM, Pacé, France)

  • Chatton Arthur

    (IDBC/A2COM, Pacé, France)

Abstract

Background The positivity assumption is crucial when drawing causal inferences from observational studies, but it is often overlooked in practice. A violation of positivity occurs when the sample contains a subgroup of individuals with an extreme relative frequency of experiencing one of the levels of exposure. To correctly estimate the causal effect, we must identify such individuals. For this purpose, we suggest a regression tree-based algorithm. Development Based on a succession of regression trees, the algorithm searches for combinations of covariate levels that result in subgroups of individuals with a low (un)exposed relative frequency. Application We applied the algorithm by reanalyzing four recently published medical studies. We identified the two violations of the positivity reported by the authors. In addition, we identified ten subgroups with a suspicion of violation. Conclusions The PoRT algorithm helps to detect in-sample positivity violations in causal studies. We implemented the algorithm in the R package RISCA to facilitate its use.

Suggested Citation

  • Danelian Gabriel & Foucher Yohann & Léger Maxime & Le Borgne Florent & Chatton Arthur, 2023. "Identification of in-sample positivity violations using regression trees: The PoRT algorithm," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:13:n:1013
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2022-0032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2022-0032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2022-0032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:13:n:1013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.