IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v5y2010i1n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Baby Steps: Basic Income and the Need for Incremental Organizational Development

Author

Listed:
  • Murphy Jason B

    (Saint Louis University)

Abstract

Antipoverty movements have generated many "little" or "near" basic income guarantee (BIG) proposals. Most theorists discussing BIG posit a full-fledged universal grant that entirely satisfies the core value guiding their theory. Debates are conducted about feasibility, desirability and rival values. This article looks into particular considerations that need to be made when debating a little BIG. If a "status" value, meaning "all or nothing," is the core value under debate, then a grant falling short of securing this status will need some other justification. If the core value is "scalar," meaning there can be more or less of it, then a lower grant can be justified if it is an efficient way to add to that value. I offer two reasons that a little BIG can have merit: 1. Organizations will benefit because the grant provides a clear target for citizen action. 2. There are reasons to think that a BIG of whatever size will promote organizational capabilities more efficiently than money coming from an employer, family member or conditional public entitlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Murphy Jason B, 2010. "Baby Steps: Basic Income and the Need for Incremental Organizational Development," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:5:y:2010:i:1:n:7
    DOI: 10.2202/1932-0183.1122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1122
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1932-0183.1122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robeyns Ingrid, 2008. "Introduction: Revisiting the Feminism and Basic Income Debate," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Offe Claus, 2008. "Basic Income and the Labor Contract," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Suplicy Eduardo Matarazzo, 2007. "Basic Income and Employment in Brazil," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katharina Bohnenberger, 2020. "Money, Vouchers, Public Infrastructures? A Framework for Sustainable Welfare Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haagh Louise, 2007. "Basic Income, Occupational Freedom and Antipoverty Policy," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, June.
    2. Krozer, Alice, 2010. "A regional basic income: towards the eradication of extreme poverty in Central America," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL en México (Estudios e Investigaciones) 25938, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Haagh, Louise, 2011. "Working Life, Well-Being and Welfare Reform: Motivation and Institutions Revisited," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 450-473, March.
    4. Olli Kangas & Minna Ylikännö, 2023. "Basic Income and the Status of Women in an Established Gender-Equal Welfare State: Results from the Finnish Basic Income Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Fischer Yannick, 2020. "Basic Income, Labour Automation and Migration – An Approach from a Republican Perspective," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 1-034, December.
    6. Filka Sekulova & Fabricio Bonilla & Bru Laín, 2023. "Life Satisfaction and Socio-Economic Vulnerability: Evidence from the Basic Income Experiment in Barcelona," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 2035-2063, August.
    7. Büchs, Milena, 2021. "Sustainable welfare: How do universal basic income and universal basic services compare?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Offe Claus, 2008. "Basic Income and the Labor Contract," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, July.
    9. Harvey Philip, 2012. "More for Less: The Job Guarantee Strategy," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 3-18, January.
    10. E. Klein & E. Fouksman, 2022. "Reparations as a Rightful Share: From Universalism to Redress in Distributive Justice," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(1), pages 31-57, January.
    11. Palermo Kuss Ana Helena & Neumärker K. J. Bernhard, 2018. "Modelling the Time Allocation Effects of Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Martin Josh, 2016. "Universal Credit to Basic Income: A Politically Feasible Transition?," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 97-131, December.
    13. Lo Vuolo Rubén M., 2015. "Piketty’s Capital, His Critics and Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 29-43, June.
    14. Herbert Gans, 2014. "Basic Income," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 80-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:5:y:2010:i:1:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.