IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bejeap/vcontributions.5y2006i1n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indirect Costs and Discounting in Health Care Decision-Making: The Role of Distortionary Taxation

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Liqun

    (Texas A&M University, lliu@tamu.edu)

  • Rettenmaier Andrew J

    (Texas A&M University, a-rettenmaier@tamu.edu)

  • Saving Thomas R

    (Texas A&M University, t-saving@tamu.edu)

Abstract

Two important unresolved issues in the evaluation of health care programs are the treatment of indirect costs and the selection of the appropriate discount rate. This paper emphasizes the role of distortionary taxation in addressing these issues. It establishes that: (i) indirect government-paid costs should be treated differently from indirect privately-paid costs; (ii) direct and indirect government costs of a health program should be discounted by the gross rate of return, while consumers' monetary valuations of the program's effects, less direct private costs, should be discounted at the net rate of return; and (iii) the present value of total government costs should be multiplied by a marginal cost of funds before it is comparable to the present value of net private benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Liqun & Rettenmaier Andrew J & Saving Thomas R, 2006. "Indirect Costs and Discounting in Health Care Decision-Making: The Role of Distortionary Taxation," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:contributions.5:y:2006:i:1:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/1538-0645.1512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/1538-0645.1512
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/1538-0645.1512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liqun Liu & Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Thomas R. Saving, 2012. "Endogenous Patient Responses and the Consistency Principle in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(3), pages 488-497, May.
    2. Liqun Liu & Andrew J. Rettenmaier & Thomas R. Saving, 2008. "Longevity bias in cost‐effectiveness analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 523-534, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:contributions.5:y:2006:i:1:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.