IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bejeap/v23y2023i4p1155-1162n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lab versus Online Experiments: Gender Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Braut Beatrice

    (Department of Economics, University of Genoa, Via Vivaldi, 5 – 16126 Genova, Italy)

Abstract

Comparing the behaviour of subjects randomly allocated to perform tasks and tests online or in the lab, I find that the setting influences males’ and females’ behaviour differently. Males are more selfish in the online setting than in the lab, while females are more risk-averse when they answer online compared to the lab. Interestingly, performance in math is influenced by the setting for females: online they perform better. The gender gap in numeracy closes online, while it is present in the lab, where males solve more math problems. This work provides preliminary evidence on how gender differences and gaps can be altered by the setting. As online settings have become more and more common practice in running experiments and have started to be used also in education, it is important to understand the consequences that this shift implies also relative to gender differences and gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Braut Beatrice, 2023. "Lab versus Online Experiments: Gender Differences," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 23(4), pages 1155-1162, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:23:y:2023:i:4:p:1155-1162:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2022-0451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2022-0451
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bejeap-2022-0451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:23:y:2023:i:4:p:1155-1162:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.