IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bot/rivsta/v70y2010i4p481-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The permutation testing approach: a review

Author

Listed:
  • Fortunato Pesarin

    (University of Padova - Italy)

  • Luigi Salmaso

    (University of Padova - Italy)

Abstract

In recent years permutation testing methods have increased both in number of applications and in solving complex multivariate problems. A large number of testing problems may also be usefully and effectively solved by traditional parametric or rank-based nonparametric methods, although in relatively mild conditions their permutation counterparts are generally asymptotically as good as the best ones. Permutation tests are essentially of an exact nonparametric nature in a conditional context, where conditioning is on the pooled observed data as a set of sufficient statistics in the null hypothesis. Instead, the reference null distribution of most parametric tests is only known asymptotically. Thus, for most sample sizes of practical interest, the possible lack of efficiency of permutation solutions may be compensated by the lack of approximation of parametric counterparts.There are many complex multivariate problems (quite common in biostatistics, clinical trials, engineering, the environment, epidemiology, experimental data, industrial statistics, pharmacology, psychology, social sciences, etc.) which are difficult to solve outside the conditional framework and outside the nonparametric combination (NPC) method for dependent permutation tests. In this paper we review this method along with a number of applications in different experimental and observational situations (e.g. multi-sided alternatives, zero-inflated data and testing for a stochastic ordering) and we present properties specific to this methodology, such as: for a given number of subjects, when the number of variables diverges and the noncentrality of the combined test diverges accordingly, then the power of combination-based permutation tests converges to one.

Suggested Citation

  • Fortunato Pesarin & Luigi Salmaso, 2010. "The permutation testing approach: a review," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 70(4), pages 481-509.
  • Handle: RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:70:y:2010:i:4:p:481-509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Demuynck, Thomas & Salman, Umutcan, 2022. "On the revealed preference analysis of stable aggregate matchings," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(4), November.
    2. Virginie Rozée & Sayeed Unisa & Elise de La Rochebrochard, 2019. "Sociodemographic characteristics of 96 Indian surrogates: Are they disadvantaged compared with the general population?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-9, March.
    3. Antonio D’Ambrosio & Sonia Amodio & Carmela Iorio & Giuseppe Pandolfo & Roberta Siciliano, 2021. "Adjusted Concordance Index: an Extensionl of the Adjusted Rand Index to Fuzzy Partitions," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 38(1), pages 112-128, April.
    4. Roman Tikhonov & Aleksey Masyutin & Vadim Anpilogov, 2021. "The Relationship Between the Financial Performance of Banks and the Quality of Credit Scoring Models," Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Bank of Russia, vol. 80(2), pages 76-95, June.
    5. Laurens Cherchye & Dieter Saelens & Reha Tuncer, 2024. "From unobserved to observed preference heterogeneity: a revealed preference methodology," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(363), pages 996-1022, July.
    6. Chenyuan Hu & Shuoyan Zhang & Tianyu Gu & Zhuangzhi Yan & Jiehui Jiang, 2022. "Multi-Task Joint Learning Model for Chinese Word Segmentation and Syndrome Differentiation in Traditional Chinese Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Laurens Cherchye & Thomas Demuynck & Bram De Rock & Joshua Lanier, 2020. "Are Consumers Rational ?Shifting the Burden of Proof," Working Papers ECARES 2020-19, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bot:rivsta:v:70:y:2010:i:4:p:481-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giovanna Galatà (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dsbolit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.