IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v75y2023i2p51-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Theory And Sustainability In The Economic Choice - Impact Of Evolutionism

Author

Listed:
  • DINGA Emil

    (Centre for Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slăvescu" of Romanian Academy)

Abstract

The paper aims to question the required decision theory concept, structure, and mechanism under the current challenges of optimality model of rationality crepuscule, sustainability model of rationality emergence, and evolutionism extending from the biological species to the symbolic ones (as decision theory is). To this end, the three symbolic species are logically described based on their sufficiency predicates, then the three sets of sufficiency predicates are put together in order to find the compatibility among them, as either binomial or trinomial compatibility. So, three complete compatibilities are found based on which some concluding remarks are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • DINGA Emil, 2023. "Decision Theory And Sustainability In The Economic Choice - Impact Of Evolutionism," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 75(2), pages 51-59, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:75:y:2023:i:2:p:51-59
    DOI: 10.56043/reveco-2023-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/75205dinga.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56043/reveco-2023-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sufficiency Predicates; Logical Compatibility; Symbolic Species;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:75:y:2023:i:2:p:51-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.