IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v67y2015i6p147-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Procedural Legal Relationship In The Field Of Competition. The Case Study - Moldovan Competition Council

Author

Listed:
  • CARARE Viorica

    (Competition Council of Republic of Moldova)

Abstract

The procedural legal relationship in the field of competition is a superstructure relationship that develops depending on the social order. Large variety of different countries conditions requires modernization of criteria, norms and standards of competition regulation and methods of enforcement. The elements of competition procedural legal relationship are established in the paper and developed the application of competition legislation in Republic of Moldova. Originality and practical applications of research are based on empirical studies completed by Moldovan Competition Board.

Suggested Citation

  • CARARE Viorica, 2015. "Procedural Legal Relationship In The Field Of Competition. The Case Study - Moldovan Competition Council," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(6), pages 147-157, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:67:y:2015:i:6:p:147-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/67613carare.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:reg:rpubli:443 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caraganciu Anatolie & Tiuhtii Constanța, 2017. "Economic Concentrations vs State of Competitive Space," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 168-172, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competition criteria; Competition norms; Antimonopoly authorities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:67:y:2015:i:6:p:147-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.