Author
Listed:
- David T. Allen
- Felipe J. Cardoso‐Saldaña
- Gary McGaughey
- Elena McDonald‐Buller
- Mort Webster
Abstract
Expanded production of natural gas liquids (NGLs, ethane, propane, butanes) in the United States may continue to be utilized in domestic and international chemical manufacturing; however, this would require the development of expanded transport infrastructures. Electricity generation is an alternative use for NGLs. As a case study of the value of NGLs in electricity generation, the potential use of NGLs in the Texas electrical grid was evaluated. It was assumed that electricity would be generated in 25‐MW gas turbines, located at gas‐processing plants where NGLs in produced gas are separated to create pipeline‐quality gas. The potential magnitude of NGL‐based power generation in the Texas grid, using NGLs produced in the Eagle Ford and Barnett oil and gas production regions in Texas, was estimated to be up to 2.7 GW of electricity, 6% of average demand on the grid. The NGL‐based electricity generation displaced coal and natural gas‐based generation, with little impact on the use of renewables. At the assumed efficiency (34.7%) and nonfuel operating cost ($7/MWh) of small gas turbines, NGLs are only fully utilized for electricity generation in the Texas grid when fuel prices are lower than $1.50 per million BTU (a discount of $0.90 per million BTU relative to the fuel price of coal assumed in the modeling). Higher prices might be supported if NGLs are used for electricity generation at times of high demand or if larger, higher efficiency turbines are utilized. WIREs Energy Environ 2018, 7:e258. doi: 10.1002/wene.258 This article is categorized under: Fossil Fuels > Systems and Infrastructure Energy Infrastructure > Systems and Infrastructure
Suggested Citation
David T. Allen & Felipe J. Cardoso‐Saldaña & Gary McGaughey & Elena McDonald‐Buller & Mort Webster, 2018.
"Uses for expanded production of natural gas liquids: chemicals or power?,"
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:wireae:v:7:y:2018:i:1:n:e258
DOI: 10.1002/wene.258
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Naquash, Ahmad & Haider, Junaid & Al-Sobhi, Saad A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2022.
"State-of-the-art assessment of natural gas liquids recovery processes: Techno-economic evaluation, policy implications, open issues, and the way forward,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:wireae:v:7:y:2018:i:1:n:e258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2041-8396 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.