IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v99y2008i1p115-124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing The Success Of Open Space Preservation In The Netherlands: The Midden‐Delfland Case

Author

Listed:
  • EVELIEN VAN RIJ
  • JASPER DEKKERS
  • ERIC KOOMEN

Abstract

Open space preservation is an important aim of spatial planning. In the Netherlands, the recreational, ecological and historic values of open spaces between cities, the buffer zones, are recognised and thus receive ample attention from policy‐makers. This paper focuses on Midden‐Delfland, an open area in the metropolitan western part of the country. A specific combination of policy instruments and government regulation has made the preservation of open space in this area very successful even compared to other buffer zones. A quantitative analysis of the land‐use changes and a more qualitative review of the applied policy instruments are presented here in an attempt to explain this success. The analysis can help planners in finding ways to effectively protect contested open areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelien Van Rij & Jasper Dekkers & Eric Koomen, 2008. "Analysing The Success Of Open Space Preservation In The Netherlands: The Midden‐Delfland Case," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(1), pages 115-124, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:99:y:2008:i:1:p:115-124
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00443.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00443.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2008.00443.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel E Orenstein & Amnon Frenkel & Faris Jahshan, 2014. "Methodology Matters: Measuring Urban Spatial Development Using Alternative Methods," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(1), pages 3-23, February.
    2. Hege Hofstad, 2015. "Handling Tensions in the ‘Everyday Landscape’: Moving beyond the Development—Conservation Conflict?," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 358-375, April.
    3. Wojciech Sroka & Jaroslaw Mikolajczyk & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Boguslawa Kwoczynska, 2018. "Agricultural Land vs. Urbanisation in Chosen Polish Metropolitan Areas: A Spatial Analysis Based on Regression Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Marleen Buizer & Bas Arts & Judith Westerink, 2016. "Landscape governance as policy integration ‘from below’: A case of displaced and contained political conflict in the Netherlands," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(3), pages 448-462, May.
    5. Dekkers, J. & Koomen, E., 2008. "Valuation of open space: Hedonic house price analyses in the Dutch Randstad region," Serie Research Memoranda 0024, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:99:y:2008:i:1:p:115-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.