IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v93y2002i2p149-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process of Othering in the case of India and Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay Chaturvedi

Abstract

Integral to the geopolitics of place‐making on the subcontinent, having acquired hegemonic categorical forms in the imperial mapping of ‘India’ as two opposed and self‐contained communities of the ‘Hindus’ and the ‘Muslims’, authenticated by an ‘unclean partition’, the otherness in the case of India and Pakistan persists in its various avatars. The reflexivity in the process of othering is evident in the character as well as behaviour of nations, which not only define themselves in respect to each other, but also seek for some kind of purity for the self through the demonisation of the other. Otherness is further reinforced through hegemonic, homogenising, state‐centric discourses on ‘national identity’ and ‘national (in)security’, and exclusivist geopolitical imaginations of various ethno‐religious groups. The discourse of otherness meets practice not only in the Pakistani social studies curriculum but also at the least expected site of the Wagah border crossing between Pakistan and India. But it does raise a few difficult questions, which are worth probing by inter‐disciplinary, comparative studies of partition.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay Chaturvedi, 2002. "Process of Othering in the case of India and Pakistan," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(2), pages 149-159, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:93:y:2002:i:2:p:149-159
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9663.00191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00191
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9663.00191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:93:y:2002:i:2:p:149-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.