IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v41y2025i1ne1794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic method to integrate co‐produced causal loop diagrams based on feedback stories

Author

Listed:
  • Jefferson K. Rajah
  • Birgit Kopainsky

Abstract

Within participatory systems dynamics, more practitioners are compiling co‐produced causal loop diagrams (CLDs) to analyse and report workshop outputs. Though not formalized, existing documented techniques have been limited to analyses of representations in single‐group diagrams predicated on, at times, untraceable subjective judgements. This paper addresses the need for a systematic method to guide and justify the subjective decisions made in the integration process. We propose a multistep, three‐stage process that synthesizes feedback stories from representations in diagrams (i.e. what is represented) and transcripts of the participatory process (i.e. what is said). This approach enables practitioners to report the interpretive scheme through which qualitative data are analysed and, thus, support the subjective decisions they made during the integration process. Using a case study, we demonstrate the application of this method and its potential for narrowing the semantic distance between participants, practitioners and external audience for interpreting and analysing an integrated diagram. © 2024 The Author(s). System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Jefferson K. Rajah & Birgit Kopainsky, 2025. "A systematic method to integrate co‐produced causal loop diagrams based on feedback stories," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 41(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:41:y:2025:i:1:n:e1794
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1794
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.1794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:41:y:2025:i:1:n:e1794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.