IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sysdyn/v40y2024i2ne1757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of loop dominance methods: measures and meaning

Author

Listed:
  • John Hayward
  • Paul A. Roach

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hayward & Paul A. Roach, 2024. "A comparison of loop dominance methods: measures and meaning," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:40:y:2024:i:2:n:e1757
    DOI: 10.1002/sdr.1757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1757
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sdr.1757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Schoenberg & John Hayward & Robert Eberlein, 2023. "Improving Loops that Matter," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 140-151, April.
    2. Rogelio Oliva, 2020. "On structural dominance analysis," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 8-28, January.
    3. William Schoenberg & Pål Davidsen & Robert Eberlein, 2020. "Understanding model behavior using the Loops that Matter method," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 158-190, April.
    4. Rogelio Oliva, 2016. "Structural dominance analysis of large and stochastic models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(1), pages 26-51, January.
    5. Saleh, Mohamed & Oliva, Rogelio & Kampmann, Christian Erik & Davidsen, Pål I., 2010. "A comprehensive analytical approach for policy analysis of system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 673-683, June.
    6. John Hayward & Paul A. Roach, 2017. "Newton's laws as an interpretive framework in system dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 33(3-4), pages 183-218, July.
    7. John Hayward & Graeme P. Boswell, 2014. "Model behaviour and the concept of loop impact: A practical method," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 30(1-2), pages 29-57, January.
    8. Hayward, John & Roach, Paul A., 2019. "The concept of force in population dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 531(C).
    9. John Hayward & Paul A. Roach, 2022. "The concept of energy in the analysis of system dynamics models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(1), pages 5-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Schoenberg & Robert Eberlein & Pål Davidsen, 2024. "Measuring the change in behavior of a system with a single metric," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(1), January.
    2. William Schoenberg & John Hayward & Robert Eberlein, 2023. "Improving Loops that Matter," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 140-151, April.
    3. John Hayward & Paul A. Roach, 2022. "The concept of energy in the analysis of system dynamics models," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(1), pages 5-40, January.
    4. William Schoenberg & Pål Davidsen & Robert Eberlein, 2020. "Understanding model behavior using the Loops that Matter method," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 158-190, April.
    5. Erling Moxnes & Sergey Naumov, 2024. "Analysis of dynamic models by optimization," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(1), January.
    6. Steven E. Wallis, 2021. "Understanding and improving the usefulness of conceptual systems: An Integrative Propositional Analysis‐based perspective on levels of structure and emergence," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 426-447, August.
    7. Turner, Benjamin L., 2020. "Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    8. Edward G. Anderson & David R. Keith & Jose Lopez, 2023. "Opportunities for system dynamics research in operations management for public policy," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1895-1920, June.
    9. Rogelio Oliva, 2020. "On structural dominance analysis," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 8-28, January.
    10. John Sterman, 2018. "System dynamics at sixty: the path forward," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 5-47, January.
    11. Abram, Joseph J. & Dyke, James G., 2018. "Structural Loop Analysis of Complex Ecological Systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 333-342.
    12. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    13. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-ming, 2012. "Prediction of China's coal production-environmental pollution based on a hybrid genetic algorithm-system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 521-529.
    14. Jean‐Francois Trani & Megan Giesecke & Peter Hovmand & Nicholas Miller & Mary Kate Cartmill & Nicandro Mandujano Acevedo & Sandra Lee & William Liem & Braveheart Gillani & Ganesh Babulal, 2024. "Ageing among Black and non‐Hispanic White older adults: A community‐based system dynamics approach to examining quality of life," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 30-51, January.
    15. Mert Edali, 2022. "Pattern‐oriented analysis of system dynamics models via random forests," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 38(2), pages 135-166, April.
    16. Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Richard C. Larson, 2018. "SD meets OR: a new synergy to address policy problems," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 327-353, January.
    17. Apostolos Vetsikas & Yeoryios Stamboulis & Vasiliki Georgatzi, 2024. "Exploring the coevolution of heterogeneous actors in national innovation systems: a system dynamics analysis of Finland," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 581-610, October.
    18. Sujit De & Shib Sana, 2015. "Backlogging EOQ model for promotional effort and selling price sensitive demand- an intuitionistic fuzzy approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 57-76, October.
    19. Florian Dierickx & Arnaud Diemer, 2020. "Challenging a Methodology to Analyse the Cycling of Materials and Induced Energy use Over Time," International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 26(4), pages 106-124, November.
    20. Castaneda, Monica & Herrera, Milton M. & Méndez-Morales, Alberto, 2023. "A simulation-based approach for assessing the innovation barriers in the manufacturing firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sysdyn:v:40:y:2024:i:2:n:e1757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0883-7066 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.