IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v46y2025i1p3-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta‐analytic review

Author

Listed:
  • Donald D. Bergh
  • Laura D'Oria
  • T. Russell Crook
  • Ashley Roccapriore

Abstract

Research Summary The knowledge‐based view (KBV) claims that knowledge is the most important strategic resource because it is the strongest determinant of firm competitive advantage and the glue that pulls resources together. We examine this assertion through a meta‐analysis of the accumulated evidence on the relationships among strategic resources and firm performance (stock market, financial performance, and growth). Findings from 348 samples reporting 248,136 firm‐level observations show that knowledge resources have the highest positive association with all three performance dimensions, with the highest positive relationship with growth, followed by market and then financial performance. Further, knowledge may serve as a foundational resource by augmenting other strategic resources and helping make firms different. These findings support the KBV's core prediction that knowledge resources offer superior strategic value. Managerial Summary Managers need to understand what resources yield the strongest and most consistent returns. We examined the often‐invoked claim that knowledge is the most important resource associated with firm success. Our study combines evidence from over 300 samples and finds that knowledge‐based resources are consistently associated with the strongest profit, stock market, and growth returns relative to other types of resource investments. For managers, the message is clear—acquire, integrate, retain, and motivate knowledge‐related resources because doing so pays off.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald D. Bergh & Laura D'Oria & T. Russell Crook & Ashley Roccapriore, 2025. "Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta‐analytic review," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 3-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:3-18
    DOI: 10.1002/smj.3645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3645
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/smj.3645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:46:y:2025:i:1:p:3-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.