IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v79y2025i1ne12369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Omitting continuous covariates in binary regression models: Implications for sensitivity and mediation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Gasparin
  • Bruno Scarpa
  • Elena Stanghellini

Abstract

In statistical analysis, Cochran's formula plays a crucial role in disentangling the relationships between marginal and conditional regression coefficients. However, its results and implications are valid only within the linear case. Despite this, due to its simplicity and interpretability, practitioners often continue to use Cochran's formula also outside linear models. With reference to binary outcome models, we derived the approximated expression of the marginal regression coefficient when marginalization is performed over a continuous covariate and show that it mimics Cochran's formula under certain simplifying assumptions. We initially postulate a logistic link function and then show how it can be generalized. We then explore the implications of this formula in the context of sensitivity analysis and causal mediation analysis, thereby enlarging the number of circumstances where explicit parametric formulations can be used to evaluate causal direct and indirect effects, otherwise computed via numerical integration. Simulations show that our proposed estimators perform equally well as others based on numerical methods and that the additional interpretability of the explicit formulas does not compromise their precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Gasparin & Bruno Scarpa & Elena Stanghellini, 2025. "Omitting continuous covariates in binary regression models: Implications for sensitivity and mediation analysis," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 79(1), February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:79:y:2025:i:1:n:e12369
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12369
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:79:y:2025:i:1:n:e12369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.