IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v79y2025i1ne12364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The power functions of Begg's and Egger's tests for publication bias

Author

Listed:
  • Haben Michael

Abstract

Publication bias undermines the results of meta‐analyses and other systematic reviews. Applying a formal test for publication bias is therefore a part of many protocols for conducting a meta‐analysis. To be effective in this role, the tests must have good power to detect the presence of publication bias. We derive the local limiting power functions and study the Pitman relative efficiency for two popular tests, Begg's and Egger's tests. The analysis suggests that the differences between the two arise out of built‐in robustness properties of Begg's test. These work to its detriment in the commonly used Gaussian model, but leave it with better efficiency when study effects are heavy‐tailed or skew.

Suggested Citation

  • Haben Michael, 2025. "The power functions of Begg's and Egger's tests for publication bias," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 79(1), February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:79:y:2025:i:1:n:e12364
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12364
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:79:y:2025:i:1:n:e12364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.