IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v77y2023i4p543-554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The optimal input‐independent baseline for binary classification: The Dutch Draw

Author

Listed:
  • Joris Pries
  • Etienne van de Bijl
  • Jan Klein
  • Sandjai Bhulai
  • Rob van der Mei

Abstract

Before any binary classification model is taken into practice, it is important to validate its performance on a proper test set. Without a frame of reference given by a baseline method, it is impossible to determine if a score is “good” or “bad.” The goal of this paper is to examine all baseline methods that are independent of feature values and determine which model is the “best” and why. By identifying which baseline models are optimal, a crucial selection decision in the evaluation process is simplified. We prove that the recently proposed Dutch Draw baseline is the best input‐independent classifier (independent of feature values) for all order‐invariant measures (independent of sequence order) assuming that the samples are randomly shuffled. This means that the Dutch Draw baseline is the optimal baseline under these intuitive requirements and should therefore be used in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Joris Pries & Etienne van de Bijl & Jan Klein & Sandjai Bhulai & Rob van der Mei, 2023. "The optimal input‐independent baseline for binary classification: The Dutch Draw," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(4), pages 543-554, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:543-554
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:543-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.