Author
Abstract
Automatic sampling; its possibilities and applications. The problem considered is that of sampling a lot of coal or ore in order to determine the average content of some essential component; as a particular example the sampling of coal for ash content is taken. Three sources of error are considered, namely: 1 the sampling error, depending on the size of, and the distribution of ash content amongst, the grains; this error can be reduced by taking a large sample; 2 the error due to inhomogeneities in the lot, which can be cut down by using a gross sample composed of a large number of increments; and 3 the error in the analysis, including the errors introduced by grinding and dividing the gross sample into the final sample of about 1 gram used for the determination of ash content. The accuracy (a) corresponding to 99% confidence limits is expressed in a simple formula, (1), in which the influence of each of the sources of error is represented by a separate term. Taking as a lot the coal produced at a mine during a shift, the formula shows that, to achieve a reasonable accuracy of a =i/0 ash, at least some 150 to 200 increments have to be taken, the second sourse of error (inhomogeneity of the lot) being by far the most important one. The size of the increments can be relatively small so that the weight of the gross sample stays within acceptable limits. This large number of increments necessitates the use of an automatic sampling procedure. In § 3 a sampler developed and installed at one of the Dutch State Mines is described together with the precautions required to prevent bias in the samples due tj segregation of the coal across the conveyor belt. For further details the English reader may be referred to Fuel 19, 101–105,1950.
Suggested Citation
J. Visman, 1950.
"Het belong van automatische monsterneming; mogelijkheden en toepas‐singen,"
Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 4(5), pages 184-194, October.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:stanee:v:4:y:1950:i:5:p:184-194
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1950.tb00431.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:4:y:1950:i:5:p:184-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.