The Regenerative Semantics and Structural Change: Social Systems Using Nature as a Regenerative Medium

This study examines how recursive feedback, and shifts toward regenerative semantics co‐evolve with systemic autopoiesis, transitioning businesses to regenerative models. Methods: Grounded in Luhmann's Social Systems Theory, the research develops and applies a conceptual transition model based on Luhmann's understanding of evolution. Four illustrative cases demonstrate regenerative practices and various positions in the emerging ecoservice market. Results: The findings reveal that recalibrated market mechanisms, such as payments for ecosystem services, digitally supported transparency, and new supply chains are critical for adoption of regenerative models. Meta‐reflection, reflection, and reflexivity embed regenerative principles into organizational practices and polycentric networks. Conclusions: While early progress is evident, achieving a regenerative phase transition requires broader regulatory support, strengthened shared semantics, and accelerated adoption. Regenerative semantics enable society, including businesses, to move beyond harm mitigation, extensionally engage to regenerating nature and enhancing human well‐being, offering a hopeful but non‐deterministic path to a regenerative future.