IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i1p83-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pragmatic ontology—Enhancing the philosophical foundation of critical systems thinking/practice

Author

Listed:
  • Zhichang Zhu

Abstract

A sound theoretical foundation for multimethodology should be consistent across the main branches of philosophy: ontological heterogeneity, epistemological plurality and methodological multiplicity. In this light, I posit that (1) Jackson's recent embracement of pragmatism lacks a critical element, a well‐formulated ontology; (2) to overcome this shortcoming, it is necessary to bring ontology back into critical systems thinking/practice; and (3) such an urgent task has further to overcome the current indifference in systems thinking toward ontology. I shall draw intellectual insights from Quine's ‘ontological commitment’, Habermas's ‘ontological presupposition’, Xu Changfu's ‘theory of heterogeneity’, Husserl's ‘ontology layers’, Gadamer's hermeneutic notions ‘prejudice’ and ‘tradition’, as well as ‘ontology building’ practice across the natural and social sciences. I shall also use a multimethodology approach, wuli–shili–renli (WSR), as an example to illustrate the working and evolving of pragmatic ontology.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhichang Zhu, 2025. "Pragmatic ontology—Enhancing the philosophical foundation of critical systems thinking/practice," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 83-97, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:1:p:83-97
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3089
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:1:p:83-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.