IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v42y2025i1p206-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Utility of Critical Systems Practice: A Supply Chain Practitioner Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Daniell Wilden
  • John Hopkins
  • Ian Sadler

Abstract

This paper explores the application of critical systems practice (CSP) in the context of supply chain management to address disruptions caused by the COVID‐19 pandemic. The study examined the theoretical application of CSP to a real‐world food supply chain case, reviewing how systems thinking can enhance resilience by addressing systemic issues. The case analysis reveals the tactical approaches taken in response to the disruptive effects caused by the pandemic. A causal analysis reveals the presence of unreconciled elements, for example, a lack of inventory transparency between firms, classified as unresolved systemic issues that negatively affect the ability of the wider supply chain to manage the discontinuity of the supply chain. A conceptual framework and retrospective theoretical application articulate CSP's utility in addressing unreconciled systemic issues. This paper is one of the first applications of CSP in a supply chain context, providing a novel lens for examining resilience. Limitations include the research approach (retrospection), with further longitudinal studies, suggested to empirically assess the conceptual framework postulated in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniell Wilden & John Hopkins & Ian Sadler, 2025. "The Utility of Critical Systems Practice: A Supply Chain Practitioner Perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 206-218, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:1:p:206-218
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.3117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.3117
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.3117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:42:y:2025:i:1:p:206-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.