IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v41y2024i2p338-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

LOGOSOFIA: A platform for deliberative co‐construction of intersubjective consensual realities

Author

Listed:
  • Jeff Diedrich
  • Alexander Christakis
  • Maria Kakoulaki

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit lessons learned regarding the process of Structured Dialogic Design in the arena during the past 50 years. Thirteen Lessons are presented with the intent of helping stakeholders design a strategy for escaping the labyrinth (vicious cycle) produced by the strong interactions among three issues: (1) the critical role of inclusive deliberative dialogue; (2) the dependency of inclusive deliberative dialogue on the application of a systemic methodology for supporting its authentic implementation; and (3) the commitment by organizations to inclusive deliberative dialogue. This paper will also discuss the development and deployment of Logosifa, the latest software platform to support the process and the enhancements (including improved metrics and a facilitator dashboard) informed by the lessons learned.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeff Diedrich & Alexander Christakis & Maria Kakoulaki, 2024. "LOGOSOFIA: A platform for deliberative co‐construction of intersubjective consensual realities," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 338-353, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:2:p:338-353
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2969
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2969?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:41:y:2024:i:2:p:338-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.