IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v36y2019i5p656-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic virtues as a foundation for a general theory of design elegance

Author

Listed:
  • David Rousseau
  • Julie Billingham
  • Javier Calvo‐Amodio

Abstract

Recent discussion and research in systems engineering have highlighted the need for a principled approach to attaining elegance in engineered systems, in order to enhance product value and reduce life cycle risks. In this paper, we analyse the “elegance factors” pertaining to designed systems from the perspective of the philosophy of value (axiology) and characterize the elegance factors as “systemic virtues,” analogous to philosophical models of the factors pertaining to the “goodness” of persons and scientific theories. We defend the possibility of the existence and discovery of general systems laws that could ground a general theory of design elegance, and report on our strategy and progress in developing methods for discovering such laws and for developing such a theory.

Suggested Citation

  • David Rousseau & Julie Billingham & Javier Calvo‐Amodio, 2019. "Systemic virtues as a foundation for a general theory of design elegance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 656-667, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:36:y:2019:i:5:p:656-667
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2627
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Rousseau, 2020. "The Theoretical Foundation(s) for Systems Engineering? Response to Yearworth," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 188-191, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:36:y:2019:i:5:p:656-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.