IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v35y2018i6p632-644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Complexity Reduction to Moral Character: A Deweyian Reading of Luhmann's Social Systems Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Vladislav Valentinov
  • Ingo Pies

Abstract

Taking account of the widest possible range of consequences of one's action takes centre stage in John Dewey's pragmatist ethics, which likewise acknowledges that the ability to do so depends on the individual moral character. In contrast, Luhmann's theory of complexity‐reducing systems underscores the difficulties that social systems experience in registering the consequences of their operations in the overwhelmingly complex environment. Drawing upon Dewey's concept of moral character, the paper argues that social systems can be infused with an interest in controlling those consequences that pose risks to their sustainability. From an institutional economics perspective, this interest is shown to be implicated in the justification of the firm ownership in Alchian and Demsetz's theory of the firm. From the business ethics perspective, a similar interest is shown to underpin corporate social responsibility activities. Both perspectives acknowledge the effect of the corporate moral character on the predictability, reliability, and orderliness of corporate behaviour. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladislav Valentinov & Ingo Pies, 2018. "From Complexity Reduction to Moral Character: A Deweyian Reading of Luhmann's Social Systems Theory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 632-644, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:6:p:632-644
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2507
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:6:p:632-644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.