IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v35y2018i1p22-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic Financial Feedbacks – Conceptual Framework and Modelling Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Dieter Gramlich
  • Mikhail V. Oet

Abstract

Different approaches to model feedbacks in financial systems are assessed based on requirements for the conceptualization of feedback dynamics. Given the diversity and non†linearity of systemic financial feedbacks (SFFs), modelling concepts have to be evaluated in the context of system adaption, specifically systemic interconnectivity and behaviour. Methodological approaches from System Dynamics (SD) theory are considered to provide appropriate and attractive features. Surprisingly, few SD models exist to explain SFFs. The scarcity of SD modelling for SFFs may be attributed to the lack of empirically supported economic foundations and methodological challenges for theoretical modelling. This paper considers a conceptual framework for modelling SFFs. The framework emerges from the synthesis of modelling requirements for SFFs, limitations of existing modelling approaches, and innovations from SD. In doing so, this study provides evidence for the contribution of SD concepts to complement existing SFF models and offers suggestions for further modelling towards a ‘dual approach’. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Dieter Gramlich & Mikhail V. Oet, 2018. "Systemic Financial Feedbacks – Conceptual Framework and Modelling Implications," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 22-38, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:22-38
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2419
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdulrahman Alrabiah & Steve Drew, 2020. "Proactive Management of Regulatory Policy Ripple Effects via a Computational Hierarchical Change Management Structure," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-29, May.
    2. Ben Van Vliet, 2019. "A Behavioural Approach To The Lean Startup/Minimum Viable Product Process: The Case Of Algorithmic Financial Systems," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-30, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:22-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.