IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v35y2018i1p114-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Team Ability Disparity and Reward Structure on Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Yuan
  • Yanhong Tu
  • Jian Li
  • Lutao Ning

Abstract

We examine how the performance of teams and of the individuals within them varies with disparity in team member ability and with the reward structure in place. We carry out an experiment on a sample of 240 participants which first played a Counter†Strike Game to determine their level of proficiency, then played in three†person teams made up of a high, a medium and a low level performer. We observed the effect of both a competitive reward and of a cooperative one on team performance. The results indicate that when the disparity in ability is large, teams compensated using a competitive reward outperform those subject to a cooperative reward, but when the disparity in ability is small, reward structure has no influence on team performance. Hierarchical Linear Modelling (HLM) analysis confirms these findings at the individual level. Our study has implications for optimal team composition and the structuring of rewards. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Yuan & Yanhong Tu & Jian Li & Lutao Ning, 2018. "The Impact of Team Ability Disparity and Reward Structure on Performance," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 114-126, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:114-126
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2444
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:35:y:2018:i:1:p:114-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.