IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v33y2016i2p259-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic Principles in the Study of Family Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiane R. P. P. de Araujo
  • Júlia S. N. F. Bucher‐Maluschke
  • Janari S. Pedroso

Abstract

This article presents a systems perspective on administration and psychology in the study of family owned companies. The principles of general systems theory and basic humanistic assumptions of business administration and the theoretical concepts of organizational and work psychology have been addressed. These analyses have been organized into a systematic interdisciplinary methodology to evaluate the environment of family companies and the realities of families involved in the management function. It is clearly evident that there is a pressing need to study viable ways for a joint performance evaluation between psychology and administrative functions that consider the interaction and interdependence between these disciplines. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiane R. P. P. de Araujo & Júlia S. N. F. Bucher‐Maluschke & Janari S. Pedroso, 2016. "Systemic Principles in the Study of Family Businesses," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 259-264, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:33:y:2016:i:2:p:259-264
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2381
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huber, Peter & Oberhofer, Harald & Pfaffermayr, Michael, 2017. "Who creates jobs? Econometric modeling and evidence for Austrian firm level data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 57-71.
    2. Ruan Spies & Robbie Duschinsky, 2021. "Inheriting Mary Ainsworth and the Strange Situation: Questions of Legacy, Authority, and Methodology for Contemporary Developmental Attachment Researchers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:33:y:2016:i:2:p:259-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.