IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/srbeha/v29y2012i4p377-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rewriting Theory: From Autopoiesis to Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Raf Vanderstraeten

Abstract

This paper analyzes the causes and motives for the transition to a communication‐based theory of social systems in the late work of Niklas Luhmann. In the first part of this paper, I present a brief sketch of advances in the field of cybernetics and systems research. I give special attention to some basic concepts introduced by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela: autopoiesis, organizational closure and enaction. In the second part, I discuss how these ideas may contribute to a ‘conceptual revolution’ in the social and behavioral sciences. In the late work of Niklas Luhmann, attempts to incorporate the idea of autopoiesis in his own social theory resulted in the preference for a communication‐based, instead of an action‐based, theory of social systems. Moreover, given the current transition to the information age or the knowledge society, it can also be argued that structural changes in society nowadays favor the rise of a communication‐based theory of social systems. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Raf Vanderstraeten, 2012. "Rewriting Theory: From Autopoiesis to Communication," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 377-386, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:4:p:377-386
    DOI: 10.1002/sres.2116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2116
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sres.2116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:srbeha:v:29:y:2012:i:4:p:377-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/1092-7026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.