IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i5p1699-1732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Economists Beat Sport Experts? Analysis of Medal Predictions for Sochi 2014

Author

Listed:
  • F. Javier Otamendi
  • Luis Miguel Doncel

Abstract

Objective The predictive power of expert knowledge and econometric modeling is analyzed using predictions of results at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympic Games. Method Forecasts by five sport experts and three sport‐agnostic economists are compared at the country level by medal color and by sport. Success ratios and correlation coefficients are used to make these comparisons. Results Experts beat economists, although both indicators are always above 75 percent at the country level and 60 percent at the medal‐color and sport levels. Indicators are below 40 percent when predicting individual winners and 20 percent when predicting athlete and medal color. Conclusions Expert predictions can help bettors. Econometric models can help design long‐term sport policies.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Javier Otamendi & Luis Miguel Doncel, 2018. "Can Economists Beat Sport Experts? Analysis of Medal Predictions for Sochi 2014," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1699-1732, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:5:p:1699-1732
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12530
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:5:p:1699-1732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.