IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v99y2018i4p1303-1323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Alternatives of Subjective Well‐Being: A Gender Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Lera‐López
  • Andrea Ollo‐López
  • José Manuel Sánchez‐Santos

Abstract

Objectives The objective of this article is to analyze the different roles played by key factors in individual subjective well‐being (SWB). Making a distinction between females and males, we consider the correlations of different characteristics of a healthy lifestyle, work environment, and social support with happiness in Spain. Methods Based on a sample of 10,821 Spanish people, we applied ordered probit models and consider the possibility of common method variance. Results The results show that some elements of healthy lifestyles, such as the intensity of physical activity (PA), level of self‐perceived health, and sleeping hours are positively associated with a higher level of happiness, with some differences between genders, particularly in terms of PA. We also detected significant differences between males and females in the potential associations between individual happiness and variables measuring the social support, job satisfaction, and time spent unemployed. Conclusions The conclusions emphasize the differences between genders in explaining individual happiness and the relevance of the healthy lifestyles, different circumstances of the labor market, and social support to account for happiness.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Lera‐López & Andrea Ollo‐López & José Manuel Sánchez‐Santos, 2018. "Different Alternatives of Subjective Well‐Being: A Gender Analysis," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1303-1323, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:4:p:1303-1323
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12494
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ssqu.12494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:99:y:2018:i:4:p:1303-1323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.